The peak is a fragile regime.
Near interpolation, the model has enough freedom to fit noise but too little redundancy to distribute that fit benignly.
Move through the interpolation threshold and watch test risk rise, peak, and descend. Change label noise, regularization, sample count, and whether capacity or training time is on the horizontal axis.
Classical intuition predicts a U-shaped risk curve. Modern overparameterized models can exhibit another descent after fitting the training set exactly, because optimization and architecture bias select structured interpolating solutions rather than arbitrary ones.
Near interpolation, the model has enough freedom to fit noise but too little redundancy to distribute that fit benignly.
Clean labels reduce the cost of interpolation; corrupted labels make the transition substantially sharper.
Explicit penalties or early stopping can suppress the peak and shift the effective threshold.
Capacity must be interpreted relative to constraints, not as a raw parameter count.
For a fixed model, longer training can traverse underfit, interpolation, peak risk, and later benign fitting.
These papers document model-wise and epoch-wise double descent, benign interpolation, and high-dimensional risk. The displayed curves are explanatory.
Formalizes the double-descent risk curve.
DEEP LEARNINGShows model-wise, sample-wise, and epoch-wise forms.
BENIGN FITTINGStudies when interpolation can still generalize.
HIGH DIMENSIONSAnalyzes interpolation risk in high dimensions.